Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Uttlesford District Council

Tree preservation zone

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order dataset

16 Individual Trees 4 Groups 5 Areas

reference
1/77/04-436
name
16 Individual Trees 4 Groups 5 Areas
tree-preservation-order

undefined

1/77/04-436
tree-preservation-zone-type
woodland
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((0.188111 51.895773,0.188139 51.895778,0.188151 51.895784,0.188160 51.895791,0.188163 51.895795,0.188168 51.895809,0.188164 51.895822,0.188161 51.895826,0.188148 51.895837,0.188136 51.895842,0.188122 51.895845,0.188107 51.895846,0.188086 51.895843,0.188073 51.895838,0.188063 51.895832,0.188053 51.895820,0.188051 51.895811,0.188052 51.895802,0.188057 51.895793,0.188071 51.895782,0.188083 51.895777,0.188111 51.895773)))
point
POINT (0.188109 51.89581)
notes
entry-date
1977-03-31
start-date
1977-03-31
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree preservation zone guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that covers this zone.

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree preservation zone dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree preservation zone dataset.

How to improve Uttlesford District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL